[karmakazi]

I think (or hope) that they are joking chuch

[DrNip]

I will do a run on my Windows 7 HDD for comparison between my XP run and it.

[karmakazi]

Originally Posted by DrNip

I will do a run on my Windows 7 HDD for comparison between my XP run and it.

Would be nice for reference, but I would literally shat myself if 7 is faster

[ReverendMaynard]

start "shatting".

[karmakazi]

lol we will see

[Splave]

Each bench ran 3 times taking the best score for each

-Operating systems-
XP Beast Edition with reg tweaks only (no max mem, or large sys cache)
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 no tweaks
Windows 7 Ultimate x32 no tweaks

-Benchies-
::Wprime 32m
::Wprime 1024m
::Superpi 1m
::Superpi 32m
:iFast

-Setup-
::i7 920 d0 @ 200.5x21 = 4210mhz (201 set in bios)
::eVGA classified 4/17/2009 bios
::Kingston HyperX ddr3-2000 cas 9 @ 802mhz 8-8-8-24-1t
::Sparkle 9800gtx 512mb
::HEC Cougar 1kw
::3x Western digital caviar drives (same model, and caches, different sizes 320 300 250)

::wPrime 32m::
1st 5.179 XP
2nd 5.876 W7 x32
3rd 5.967 W7 x64

::wPrime 1024m::
1st 182.123 W7 x64
2nd 182.155 XP
3rd 183.657 W7 x32

::Superpi 1m::
1st 9.609 XP
2nd 9.641 W7 x32
3rd 9.672 W7 x64

::Superpi 32m::
1st 8:50.516 W7 x32
2nd 8:54.344 W7 x64
3rd 9:06.219 XP

:ifast::
1st 20.11 XP
2nd 20.16 W7 x32
3rd 20.19 W7 x64


Have screens but why would I lie lol


In other news lol, Ive never shaved any time using maxmem in any os. Thought 600mb is standard for 32m? 1st time I gained 5 seconds seconds

[karmakazi]

Well your XP isnt properly tweaked then

I can do a clock for clock comparison with reverendmaynard's best time on hwbot. He has 8m25.xxx s @ 4505Mhz in Windows 7

I will use XPSP3 or 2k3 maybe both if I have time

In other news ill beat it by at least 3 seconds same clocks/ram etc

And im not just making numbers up. Use performance product (PP) calculation to estimate your pi efficiency (cpu clock * pi time in seconds). You can then extrapolate/interpolate times at different clock speeds. The lower the PP the better your efficiency.

Im at work so I can only use examples from hwbot profiles. For instance in Reverend's run, 505.680 seconds * 4505 cpu = 2278088.4 PP

Versus my run 421.3 seconds * 5009 cpu = 2154768.7 PP

If you want to see my pi time at 4505 simply substitute... x * 4505 = 2154768.7. X=478.306 seconds. So I should theoretically be able to beat that score by a half minute or so. Now if I match my ram clocks to his that gap would of course close a little, but XP is still faster.

[ReverendMaynard]

win XP 32m copy wazza, 14 processes, tweaked to almost lost functionality.
http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=840922

7 32b, no tweaks.
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=852711

bit of a frquency deficit as well.

same timings, really no other changes...except that it's on a different mobo, but honestly, the Gigabyte board is out right faster clock for clock regardless.

We can throw down lots, and lots of stuff to back this up so expect a flood from the boys.

We wouldn't run it if it was slower. Maybe all these pro's just haven't figured out how to hack 7 to get an edge over us "n00bs".

[ReverendMaynard]

Originally Posted by karmakazi

Well your XP isnt properly tweaked then

I can do a clock for clock comparison with reverendmaynard's best time on hwbot. He has 8m25.xxx s @ 4505Mhz in Windows 7

I will use XPSP3 or 2k3 maybe both if I have time

beat it by 20+ seconds at the same settings, timings and what not and I'll call hax lol.

[karmakazi]

Lol well your a right nasty git arent you. Im trying to help you and you give attitude. Im gonna beat it by 20 seconds and you can eat your words...

Im not making things up your efficiency in XP is awful, and in 7 its better, but still not good.

Looking at your screenies I see at least 5 errors slowing you down.