Ride or Die OCA4LIFE!
Log In:

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2011
MaadDaawg's Avatar
MaadDaawg MaadDaawg is offline
Beyond Help
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,040
Rep Power: 21
MaadDaawg is on a distinguished road
Default

What's an AMD ? Know I heard that acroynm a long time ago, maybe a decade or two? They were supposed to dominate something or other, can't remember what.

Oh, weren't they the main competitor of Cyrex? Weren't they the first one to put multi-media profiles on their chips. First in anti-virus too IIRC?. Or were they the ones that abused a licensing agreement to "invent" their own x86 compatible chips? Been so long ago, I get confused

Guess they dominated the brands who weren't going to survive, but? one must ask the question on whether or not this AMD thing had anything to do with their demise, or if it was Darwiniasm at it's best?

Had it not been the millions and billions of stars, wait - that's someone else, okay - if it had not been for the billions of dollars the courts ordered Intel to pay AMD, would AMD still be alive or would they have gone the way of Cyrex, Radio Shack, and all the other non-players?

Looking more and more that AMD, whatever it is, will survive as a niche player at best.

Oh well
__________________

www.maaddaawg.com

Last edited by MaadDaawg; 12-07-2011 at 03:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-07-2011
Witchdoctor's Avatar
Witchdoctor Witchdoctor is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,039
Rep Power: 23
Witchdoctor will become famous soon enough
Default

Well I hope AMD still presses on, They have as good of chance at hitting something that works as well as something that doesn't

The new chip = FAIL for us but will see a lot of action in entry level laptops and desktops at the big box stores,

Maybe the next one will be good .............

My whole thing here is the lack of competition could bring a complacency to Intel and actually slow down progress as we are spoon fed small incremental bumps in performance to maximize Intels profitability

Lets face it, in the GPU market dominated by nVidia, AMD is close enough to keep them honest and one slip means the preformance crown

This keeps the R & D at nV on their game and motivated.

I just wonder what will motivate the fatcat chip maker in the CPU arena
__________________
You don't need a reason to help people
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2011
MaadDaawg's Avatar
MaadDaawg MaadDaawg is offline
Beyond Help
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,040
Rep Power: 21
MaadDaawg is on a distinguished road
Default

A lot of maybes in that thar post WD :
__________________

www.maaddaawg.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-09-2011
ShrimpBrime's Avatar
ShrimpBrime ShrimpBrime is offline
Aspiring Overclocker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14
ShrimpBrime is just getting started
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
Maximum details in which game ? And at what resolution ?
Forget about the first question, because it is granted that no IGP can handle any serious game ( Crysis 1/2, BFBC2, BF3, Assassins Creed, Hawx, Resident Evil 5, NFS Shift, anything... ) at maximum details even at just 1024x768.
Unless you consider 5fps minimum, 10fps avg, 12fps max playable framerates
I suppose next time I get a chance, I'll slap in one of your suggested games and run it on the IGP and big screen. Most of those games are playable.

The Llano rig at my house here dedicates TWO gigs of Ram to the Gpu. That's more ram than most 70$ cards you'll purchase.
__________________
Now running i7 3770K
AsRock Z77 Extreme 4
Antec 850w CP series
Mushkin PC-14900
Running DDR3-2200
Liquid cooled GTX 480
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2011
Neuromancer's Avatar
Neuromancer Neuromancer is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,645
Rep Power: 23
Neuromancer might just be on to something hereNeuromancer might just be on to something here
Default

I <3 AMD.

then again when it comes to RC, I prefer brushless to nitro. Nitro might be faster but brushless has that instant snap that Intel err I mean nitro lacks
__________________
"Don't You understand? This is Greek to me! Except I spek Greek, this is like Aramaic to me, and not the Western Dialect I can read a little." - Dr. Walter Bishop

Special relativity is not "Eat Two Big Macs."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-09-2011
Mr.Scott's Avatar
Mr.Scott Mr.Scott is offline
Classicplatforms Warrior
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 752
Rep Power: 17
Mr.Scott will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuromancer View Post
I <3 AMD.

then again when it comes to RC, I prefer brushless to nitro. Nitro might be faster but brushless has that instant snap that Intel err I mean nitro lacks
I see what you did there.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-01-2012
ShrimpBrime's Avatar
ShrimpBrime ShrimpBrime is offline
Aspiring Overclocker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14
ShrimpBrime is just getting started
Default

Crysis + 3850 stock Llano + IGP 6550D + 47" LG @ Med settings 1024x768 OR 1920 x 1080 on low. In a window @ 1024 it'll run High settings and is as large as my 22" monitor on the 47" TV and not using an HDMI cable either even though I should be.

Merry Christmas + Happy New Years btw!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0112.jpg (294.5 KB, 9 views)
__________________
Now running i7 3770K
AsRock Z77 Extreme 4
Antec 850w CP series
Mushkin PC-14900
Running DDR3-2200
Liquid cooled GTX 480
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -10. The time now is 07:20 PM.

Copyright ©2009-2014, Overclockaholics

Designed by: vBSkinworks