| OCA Contest Discussions It's All Fun In Games Until Somebody... |
 |
|

07-26-2009
|
 |
Superenthusiast
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Krypton, Hawaii
Posts: 11,028
Rep Power: 10
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickss69
Too late - all deleted as well as my 1.51 DL...sigh.
Are we to use 1.51 for both bench's now?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal-EL
Far as I know, at this moment, the bug is with i7. Regarding ur previously deleted bench runs, werent your latest runs with 1.52 faster anyways?
Also, u deleted the screenies from your pc already?
|
Rick, tell me, which bench setup did you delete faster scores on????? Corei7 or Core2?
I've restored you're deleted core 2 benchmark already and I thought ur i7 benchmarks with cpuz 1.52 were faster?
__________________
What kind of community do you intend to re-build?
tell me your sins and I'll sharpen my knife...(Take me to church)
|

07-26-2009
|
 |
OCA Gladiator
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 2,837
Rep Power: 19
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal-EL
Far as I know, at this moment, the bug is with i7. Regarding ur previously deleted bench runs, werent your latest runs with 1.52 faster anyways?
Also, u deleted the screenies from your pc already?
|
Reformat and changing OS's at the moment. No matter. So it is v1.51 for i7 and v1.52 for Core 2, correct?
|

07-26-2009
|
 |
Superenthusiast
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Krypton, Hawaii
Posts: 11,028
Rep Power: 10
|
|
Run 1.51 for both just to have continuity between the two platforms. I'm changing the req's for Core2 also.
Keep in mind, all benchmarks that have already been uploaded and submitted will be grandfathered in and valid. All new benchmarks will be required to have 1.51 in them. So if you've just finished benching and were using 1.52, go ahead and submit them within the next two minutes and they will be valid. Any longer than that and you can hump camels.
Hope this satisfies everyone. I'll check back later to see the carnage.
__________________
What kind of community do you intend to re-build?
tell me your sins and I'll sharpen my knife...(Take me to church)
|

07-26-2009
|
 |
OCA Gladiator
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 2,837
Rep Power: 19
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sofos1990
Use memset for showing us the mem frequency!
|
And you be silent sofos...we have little enough screen room as it is. 
|

07-26-2009
|
|
Full Blown Addict
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 468
Rep Power: 17
|
|
So my runs with 1.51 are valid then?
And damn Im pissed about that EP45 blowing up. Now I cant enter the Core 2 one :(
|

07-26-2009
|
 |
OCA Gladiator
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 2,837
Rep Power: 19
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil
So my runs with 1.51 are valid then?
And damn Im pissed about that EP45 blowing up. Now I cant enter the Core 2 one :(
|
Yes, all your posts are cool cecil. Sorry about your equipment bro.
|

07-26-2009
|
 |
Overclockaholic
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Decatur, Alabama
Posts: 687
Rep Power: 17
|
|
Where does one download Super PI v1.6? (my google skills blow)
__________________
|

07-26-2009
|
 |
Don't Know
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: OKC
Posts: 5,144
Rep Power: 10
|
|
|

07-26-2009
|
 |
OCA Gladiator
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 1,541
Rep Power: 18
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal-EL
Run 1.51 for both just to have continuity between the two platforms. I'm changing the req's for Core2 also.
Keep in mind, all benchmarks that have already been uploaded and submitted will be grandfathered in and valid. All new benchmarks will be required to have 1.51 in them. So if you've just finished benching and were using 1.52, go ahead and submit them within the next two minutes and they will be valid. Any longer than that and you can hump camels.
Hope this satisfies everyone. I'll check back later to see the carnage.
|
Doesn’t that leave the danger of the scores submitted with the 1.52 version being actually run at a higher speed?  I mean I’m sure we don’t have nobody trying to take advantage of the situation but still if there is something like this going on and its known to everybody I think everybody should submit it with the 1.51 version which would leave no doubt about the CPU speed.  It’s not like you need a monster LN2 session to rerun the benchies. Just my 5c to the story. Sorry everybody for putting more confusion into this but I just don’t feel this is fair at this point.
|

07-26-2009
|
 |
Superenthusiast
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Krypton, Hawaii
Posts: 11,028
Rep Power: 10
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HITandRUN
Doesn’t that leave the danger of the scores submitted with the 1.52 version being actually run at a higher speed? I mean I’m sure we don’t have nobody trying to take advantage of the situation but still if there is something like this going on and its known to everybody I think everybody should submit it with the 1.51 version which would leave no doubt about the CPU speed. It’s not like you need a monster LN2 session to rerun the benchies. Just my 5c to the story. Sorry everybody for putting more confusion into this but I just don’t feel this is fair at this point.
|
In reviewing the totality of the situation, this is the most "Fair" decision that can be rendered and the most "Accountable" action taken to preserve the integrity of the remaining portions of this contest.
Fortunately it was caught very early in the contest and the adjustment made without impacting any one bencher's overall standings.
In the scenario “a re-bench w/1.51cpu-z is implemented”, the only competitor that stands to lose is Rickss69. Every other competitor has demonstrated an improved PI score after moving to cpu-z 1.51.
Here are the current standings:
1- DrNip 920 DO 10m 49.453s
2- rickss69 950 DO 10m56.500s
3- RomDominance 920do 11m03.906s
4- Splave 920 d0 11m10.925s
5- Cecil 920 11m14.764s
So in essence, a re-bench would only affect rickss69. I do not feel that the burden of validity in this instance should be placed solely on rickss. The initial rules contained an unacceptable degree of imperfection and even with the new adjustment a certain degree of imperfection will remain. It is and always will be fallable.
So in balancing the likelihood of rickss being a dishonorable bencher and the impact on the standings, I find the actions taken to be both fair and indiscriminate.
This topic will be put even more to rest when rickss posts a yet improved PI time with the new cpu-z 1.51 requirement.
I’m all for fairness and if after this explanation of the current circumstances, any competitor that is currently ranked in the standings still feels my actions are “Unfair”, please feel free to voice your protest. I will re-assess the situation based on how impactful it is to those benchers already ranked. Outside of those parameters, the issue is perceived as resolved. CPU-Z 1.51 is required for all benches.
Supes- cool2
__________________
What kind of community do you intend to re-build?
tell me your sins and I'll sharpen my knife...(Take me to church)
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -10. The time now is 01:39 PM.
Copyright ©2009-2014, Overclockaholics
|