Ride or Die OCA4LIFE!
Log In:

Notices

Hardware/Software News News collected from around the web

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2009
Kal-EL's Avatar
Kal-EL Kal-EL is offline
Superenthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Krypton, Hawaii
Posts: 11,028
Rep Power: 10
Kal-EL is on a distinguished road
Default Intel Fast-Tick WTF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by techpowerup.com

Westmere a Fast 'Tick'?
Intel has already set foot on the 32 nm lithography, with first 32 nm based prcoessors expected to arrive in Q1 2010. These processors have already been extensively sampled, and tested by sections of the media. More importantly, 32 nm marks Intel's introduction of the Westmere architecture, which is a 32 nm optical shrink of Nehalem, with a slightly expanded feature-set making use of the possibly higher transistor loads. Starting with dual-core "Clarkale" processor, Intel plans to work out high-end six-core processors codenamed "Gulftown" within the first half of 2010. In addition to this, Intel is readying Westmere's successor, codenamed "Sandy Bridge".

While a vague die-shot of a supposedly mainstream quad-core processor based on Sandy Bridge surfaced last month, more information about it is coming to light from industry sources, according to DigiTimes. Intel will introduce the Sandy Bridge architecture in the fourth quarter of 2010. Considering the first Westmere CPUs are commercially launched ten months after its formal introduction (Westmere was unveiled in February,) the commercial launch of the first Sandy Bridge processors can't be too far away from Q4 2010. This in essence shows that Intel can afford to come up with a new flavour of CPUs every year. Nehalem will have served as a 1.25 year "tock" for the 45 nm process, while Westmere may serve as a "tick" of nearly the same length. For those of you unfamiliar with Intel's "tick-tock" model of product development cycle, The company uses a "tick-tock" model of process development, where each processor architecture gets to be made in two manufacturing processes, while each process gets to build two succeeding architectures.

Source: DigiTimes
Techpowerup

Fast tick? We're gonna do the fastest tick ever?
__________________
What kind of community do you intend to re-build?
tell me your sins and I'll sharpen my knife...(Take me to church)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2009
DrNip's Avatar
DrNip DrNip is offline
Don't Know
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: OKC
Posts: 5,144
Rep Power: 10
DrNip might just be on to something hereDrNip might just be on to something here
Default

For those that are wondering wtf they are talking tick tock here ya go.

http://www.intel.com/technology/tick-tock/index.htm

Last edited by DrNip; 08-12-2009 at 10:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-12-2009
FACE's Avatar
FACE FACE is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: E'town KY
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 19
FACE is on a distinguished road
Default

I was wondering if they were going to put out a dual core nehalem based chip. Those things should hit some serious clocks!

tick-tock = "time's a wastin'.... buy more stuff before we make new stuff."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-12-2009
Neuromancer's Avatar
Neuromancer Neuromancer is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,645
Rep Power: 23
Neuromancer might just be on to something hereNeuromancer might just be on to something here
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FACE411 View Post
I was wondering if they were going to put out a dual core nehalem based chip. Those things should hit some serious clocks!

tick-tock = "time's a wastin'.... buy more stuff before we make new stuff."
Not up on my intel-isms, but isn't that what this is? If so, it performs actually a little worse than the i7 quads I think.
__________________
"Don't You understand? This is Greek to me! Except I spek Greek, this is like Aramaic to me, and not the Western Dialect I can read a little." - Dr. Walter Bishop

Special relativity is not "Eat Two Big Macs."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2009
FACE's Avatar
FACE FACE is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: E'town KY
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 19
FACE is on a distinguished road
Default

I don't think so. It says that chip is wolfdale based. That's a core2.

The edge on that chip is the unlocked multi... Still a nice chip though.

Last edited by FACE; 08-13-2009 at 10:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-14-2009
Neuromancer's Avatar
Neuromancer Neuromancer is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,645
Rep Power: 23
Neuromancer might just be on to something hereNeuromancer might just be on to something here
Default

Ahh, missed that

Yah guess they could not get the core enhancements into a socket 775 even with stripping out QPI and such
__________________
"Don't You understand? This is Greek to me! Except I spek Greek, this is like Aramaic to me, and not the Western Dialect I can read a little." - Dr. Walter Bishop

Special relativity is not "Eat Two Big Macs."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -10. The time now is 10:14 AM.

Copyright ©2009-2014, Overclockaholics

Designed by: vBSkinworks