Ride or Die OCA4LIFE!
Log In:
Overclockaholics Forums » Welcome to Overclockaholics » Hardware/Software News » AMD Details its Bulldozer and Bobcat Architecture

Notices

Hardware/Software News News collected from around the web

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-24-2010
DrNip's Avatar
DrNip DrNip is offline
Don't Know
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: OKC
Posts: 5,144
Rep Power: 10
DrNip might just be on to something hereDrNip might just be on to something here
Default AMD Details its Bulldozer and Bobcat Architecture

Quote:
Coming in 2011

Despite the fact that AMD's upcoming products based on the Bulldozer and Bobcat architecture will appear sometime in 2011, AMD has finally shed some official light regarding the actual details about the architecture. The Bobcat will be the base of the first Fusion chip, codenamed Ontario, coming from AMD, and you can expect this one to show up in early 2011 if all goes well, while the Bulldozer will also appear in 2011, although first as a part of AMD's server and high-end dekstop products.

The Bulldozer architecture introduces two integer execution cores, something that we haven't seen so far, while sharing the rest of the components of components when needed. Bulldozer is built in 32nm SOI process technology. During the press briefing, AMD has pointed out that every Bulldozer "module" will be counted as a dual or two core, which means that simply if you pair up eight Bulldozer modules, you get a sixteen cores, as on the Interlagos, which will be one of the server parts that will show up using the Bulldozer architecture.

The Bulldozer architecture is promising a 50 percent better performance when compared to the today architecture, all thanks to the better power management, better performance thanks to the noted "multi-threading done right" architecture design, and of course, 32nm manufacturing process. Of course, Bulldozer also has a future in Fusion market, but that will come at a later date once this architecture takes strong roots in server market.

AMD_bulldozer_1.jpg

The Bobcat architecture aims at the netbook and notebook market and AMD markets this architecture as a flexible, low power and small architecture that can manage sub one watt core that has up to 90 percent of the performance when compared to the current K8-based mainstream chips. Of course, the sub-1W claim means that you have to lower the voltages and performance leaving it to be suitable only for netbooks and even smaller devices such as MIDs, but it's nice to see how low can it go when it comes to power consumption.

Despite its small size, the Bobcat will feature complete ISA support including SSE1-3, SSE3 ISA instructions and virtualization. It will have a out-of-order exectuion engine, AMD64 64-bit ISA and will feature 32kb of L1 cache.

The Bobcat architecture will show up in the Ontario APU, which will become AMD's first Fusion chip. The Ontario was pushed ahead of Llano, which based on AMD's K8-architecture, and should be ready for early 2011 timeframe.

amd_bobcat_1.jpg

Although, there has been a lot of questions regarding the upcoming products based on these architectures, AMD has decided to keep this briefing limited to the architecture itself although we are pretty sure that we'll see more and more info as we draw closer to the end of the year. AMD feels quite confident regarding these two architectures and for now everything looks promising and quite good.
SOURCE:

http://www.fudzilla.com/processors/p...t-architecture

Can't wait to see if it is truly a bulldozer or a kids bulldozer. Hopefully this chip pwn's Intel for a change.

Last edited by DrNip; 08-24-2010 at 01:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-24-2010
Neuromancer's Avatar
Neuromancer Neuromancer is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,645
Rep Power: 23
Neuromancer might just be on to something hereNeuromancer might just be on to something here
Default

Looks awesome I am just worried about the hype.

33% more cores and 50% more power.

Meaning there is only a ...

Okay my math is not good here LOL

if 4=100 6=133 but bulldozer 6=150... soo pretty much 13% Improvement in performance clock for clock.

Not going to be earth shattering..

Unless their marketting is not PR Bologna and they mean 50% performance increase core-clock per core-clock.
__________________
"Don't You understand? This is Greek to me! Except I spek Greek, this is like Aramaic to me, and not the Western Dialect I can read a little." - Dr. Walter Bishop

Special relativity is not "Eat Two Big Macs."

Last edited by Neuromancer; 08-24-2010 at 05:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-24-2010
Hondacity's Avatar
Hondacity Hondacity is offline
Beyond Help
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,975
Rep Power: 19
Hondacity will become famous soon enough
Default

50% improvement won't get amd into superpi1m sub 6 seconds range ...lol (seriously)

maybe 7 seconds range...which is good...

32nm...hmmm tasty...i wonder how amd does rma...i hope its as good as intels
__________________
relentless
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-24-2010
Neuromancer's Avatar
Neuromancer Neuromancer is offline
OCA Gladiator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,645
Rep Power: 23
Neuromancer might just be on to something hereNeuromancer might just be on to something here
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondacity View Post

32nm...hmmm tasty...i wonder how amd does rma...i hope its as good as intels

Wish I could tell you, but I have only had to RMA intel chips
__________________
"Don't You understand? This is Greek to me! Except I spek Greek, this is like Aramaic to me, and not the Western Dialect I can read a little." - Dr. Walter Bishop

Special relativity is not "Eat Two Big Macs."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -10. The time now is 12:09 PM.

Copyright ©2009-2014, Overclockaholics

Designed by: vBSkinworks