Overclockaholics Forums

Overclockaholics Forums (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/index.php)
-   Hardware/Software News (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=94)
-   -   Nvidia GT300 Detailed (http://www.overclockaholics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1211)

Kal-EL 09-30-2009 08:30 AM

Nvidia GT300 Detailed
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Techpowerup
http://tpucdn.com/images/news/nvidia.gif
NVIDIA GT300 ''Fermi'' Detailed
NVIDIA's upcoming flagship graphics processor is going by a lot of codenames. While some call it the GF100, others GT300 (based on the present nomenclature), what is certain that the NVIDIA has given the architecture an internal name of "Fermi", after the Italian physicist Enrico Fermi, the inventor of the nuclear reactor. It doesn't come as a surprise, that the codename of the board itself is going to be called "reactor", according to some sources.


Based on information gathered so far about GT300/Fermi, here's what's packed into it:
  • Transistor count of over 3 billion
    Built on the 40 nm TSMC process
    512 shader processors (which NVIDIA may refer to as "CUDA cores")
    32 cores per core cluster
    384-bit GDDR5 memory interface
    1 MB L1 cache memory, 768 KB L2 unified cache memory
    Up to 6 GB of total memory, 1.5 GB can be expected for the consumer graphics variant
    Half Speed IEEE 754 Double Precision floating point
  • Native support for execution of C (CUDA), C++, Fortran, support for DirectCompute 11, DirectX 11, OpenGL 3.1, and OpenCL
Source: Bright Side of News

BSN'd

joe90br 10-01-2009 04:18 AM

:eek::eek::eek:

Buckeye 10-01-2009 04:50 AM

These are beginning to seem like a nice GPU, hopefully we will not have to bend over to buy one, or 4 like Kal does HAHA

Neuromancer 10-01-2009 05:19 AM

Wait cuda is coded in C? Why don't we have more CUDA apps? We must have more than a few aspiring programmers in the enthusiast arena.

Kal-EL 10-01-2009 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckeye (Post 15487)
These are beginning to seem like a nice GPU, hopefully we will not have to bend over to buy one, or 4 like Kal does HAHA

Think 8800Ultra Prices and grab yee ankles. My gosh I can't even fathom paying that out. I'd sooner pick up art paper, coloring pencils and a stop watch. We'll see who renders images first :taunt:

Neuromancer 10-01-2009 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kal-EL (Post 15503)
...I'd sooner pick up art paper, coloring pencils and a stop watch. We'll see who renders images first :taunt:

Considering all we have seen about the GT300 has been created with paper and coloring pencils, I would say your chances are pretty good :)

Kal-EL 10-01-2009 08:33 AM

Pictured:
(the check they wrote to the fan manufacturer bounced so they were fitted with these tiny fans)


http://i36.tinypic.com/2zz7ntf.jpg

source: bit-tech

http://i34.tinypic.com/34inz9j.jpg

http://i34.tinypic.com/2d7sx83.jpg

http://i33.tinypic.com/2enbyf9.jpg

http://i34.tinypic.com/o00x12.jpg

http://i34.tinypic.com/2wmdfec.jpg

http://i34.tinypic.com/2d7yaew.jpg

http://i37.tinypic.com/2yjwpba.jpg

http://i36.tinypic.com/wmeauw.jpg

http://i38.tinypic.com/t6bg95.jpg

http://i33.tinypic.com/2i92r0n.jpg

Kal-EL 10-01-2009 08:47 AM

Kermi LIve! http://www.nvidia.com/object/fermi_architecture.html

Neuromancer 10-01-2009 12:58 PM

K I am confused now. The thing they were talking about in december of last year was GT300 as the Tesla card.

Considering everything so far has been talking about GPGPU, does this mean there is no GT300 desktop card expected?

also the price point of 900 dollars is probably going to be seriously low. If these are tesla cards I believe they START at a few grand a pop.

thebanik 10-02-2009 02:39 AM

Though I dont believe charlie as such, but this time, he seriously has a point, even if its not all true but atleast they dont have a working card still

http://www.semiaccurate.com/2009/10/...mi-boards-gtc/

Quote:

WHAT DO YOU DO when you have a major conference planned to introduce a card, but you don't have a card? You fake it, and Nvidia did just that

Neuromancer 10-02-2009 03:42 AM

So fanboys were trashing Charlie about his 2% yield article over at OCF. Saying that "it was already proved to be a false statement"

Considering this guy used to write for INQ, I am not going to comment on the guys credibility, one way or the other, but that faked Fermi board is definitely interesting.

Kal-EL 10-03-2009 07:39 AM

This just in, any references to Fermi in the recent Nvidia Press Release by CEO Jack Fruit Hung, are to be disregarded. Apparently, the press misunderstood the CEO's Korean accent. He was not talking about the anticipated "Fermi" launch but actually releasing information in regards to his imaginary friend "Kermi" that helps him count to 30 when brushing his teeth in the morning.

Apparently with the new "Kermi" he is able to fold the number of seconds it takes to brush the bs outa his mouth by half, bringing the total bs washout time down to 15 seconds.

Little is know about how effective the cleaning really is but we do know this CEO loves imaginary things.

That is all, carry on.

lakeside2189 10-03-2009 10:11 AM

:laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing::laughing:

Neuromancer 10-03-2009 12:49 PM

Oh that was too funny.

This is the same guy that said "How much faster can you run the Blue Screen of Death" isnt it? (In reference to the nv_______ 8800 series BSOD issues...)

Komadyret 10-03-2009 01:10 PM

Charlie got me laughing good this time. And yes, I think he touched a sore nail on Nvidias foot this time. I'm keeping an eye on the nvidia site atm to see if they worry enough to issue a statement during the weekend :laughing:

Also ther are some reasonable thoughts by nordicjedi over at 411

thebanik 10-03-2009 10:17 PM

Not sure but apparently Nvidia did issue a statement

http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15798/34/

Quote:

Nvidia confirms

Fermi that was running PhysX at Jensen's GTC keynote was real but the one that we all took pictures of was a mock-up.

The real engineering sample card is full of dangling wires. Basically, it looks like an octopus of modules and wires and the top brass at Nvidia didn't want to give that thing to Jensen. This was confirmed today by a top Nvidia VP president class chap, but the same person did confirm that the card is real and that it does exist.

Charlie was surely right about this one here. The card that Jensen showed and we all pictured is not a working sample. Some key people at Nvidia have promised to show us the picture of the real one. Stay tuned.


All times are GMT -10. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Copyright ©2009 Overclockaholics.com