![]() |
Here is a steal. Think I'll get it. Nvidia is just too damn expensive on the low end.
Great deal - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102829 5000 series option - http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102877 Whatcha think? The only advantage I can see going with 5000 series is they fixed a few of the driver features which I doubt will be used and power consumption will be less. |
i'd say like a lower end GT would be fine..
i am a nvidia only person... sorry |
All three ATI cards will do just fine. Just a matter of price. Really if they are going to do anything but surf the web, watch video clips, internet TV, etc. then I would just go with the cheapest.
|
Quote:
|
I would look to the 9600 GT
this card could give you a decent boint potencial for a quick session before you install it. It would also do playback & give them good desk top preformance O yea did I say great for a quick boint sesion .......... lmao http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/...=gpubenchmarks |
I got one of these for loading OSs and putzing. It's $60 though.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102882 3DMark06 is like a slide show so a gamer its not, but it is a 5000 series, HDCP ready, DX11, 1 GB of DDR3, and no noise at all (with no fan). I'll bench it first on the SR-2 just for a laugh. |
Quote:
|
I ran a few benchmarks with it on my email rig......way late and a real joke to post on an overclocking forum LOL.
I played SOFII with it (very old game) and I couldn't tell the difference between it and a 5870 Eyefinity 6 card. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=6364738 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=14706196 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=2337008 http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/m...0/th_12613.jpg http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/m...50/th_4235.jpg http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/m...50/th_8998.jpg http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/m...0/th_29084.jpg |
| All times are GMT -10. The time now is 03:22 AM. |
Copyright ©2009 Overclockaholics.com