[karmakazi]

Originally Posted by Kal-EL

THx for the inside scoop brother, we're honored

I posted in the hwbot forums when I first caught wind of this new engine and details were pretty much SHHHHHH DON"T TELL, lol. It sounds very cool, interesting and awesome. When we first opened up shop here at Overclockaholics, we were kicking around the idea of approaching Rich to license the hwbot code for mini-competitions and to track our members benchmarks here at overclockaholics.com. If you get a chance to discuss it with him, see if it'd be feasible to implement a small engine for forums like us to have a site specific ranking system for our members.

They are going to implement a function that users can submit for verification/validation on hwbot but it will update the proper user forums, based on some sort of API set. I.e. you will submit on the bot but the "bot" will update OCA with screenshots and hardware info. Very cool idea for sure.

I would be really doubtful that RB would license the hwbot code to anyone, unless it was in a smaller restricted/neutered form. Even if he was willing to do so, hes such a busy guy you wouldnt see it till 2011 probably lol.

[DrNip]

Sweet!

[karmakazi]

Also, I sure hope my asus rampage extreme gets back in time to compete in the S775 rankings.... HURRY ASUS!

[Kal-EL]

Originally Posted by karmakazi

They are going to implement a function that users can submit for verification/validation on hwbot but it will update the proper user forums, based on some sort of API set. I.e. you will submit on the bot but the "bot" will update OCA with screenshots and hardware info. Very cool idea for sure.

I would be really doubtful that RB would license the hwbot code to anyone, unless it was in a smaller restricted/neutered form. Even if he was willing to do so, hes such a busy guy you wouldnt see it till 2011 probably lol.

Yah, I was thinking of a small watered down engine for license to forums. But I also realized the code load he's under and said F-it, we'll keep track by hand, lol.

[crio]

I have a serious doudt that Shahryar_NEO time at 32M was done at 3200...No tweaks have benn made (see available memmory) and RAM are at 1200 with 5-5-5 DDR2...
Sorry to report that but i believe it is not legal (regardless of the post limit)

[dinos22]

Originally Posted by crio

I have a serious doudt that Shahryar_NEO time at 32M was done at 3200...No tweaks have benn made (see available memmory) and RAM are at 1200 with 5-5-5 DDR2...
Sorry to report that but i believe it is not legal (regardless of the post limit)

look at the start times
are you sure you are running LSC
sorry to ask but the difference is astonishing to me

start time is an indication of LSC not running or being at much different clocks. i cant think of of others unless you are really working on some weird wazza but why such a huge difference

[rickss69]

Originally Posted by dinos22

look at the start times
are you sure you are running LSC
sorry to ask but the difference is astonishing to me

start time is an indication of LSC not running or being at much different clocks. i cant think of of others unless you are really working on some weird wazza but why such a huge difference

I'm afraid I must concur...

[dinos22]

rick why dont you test with XP man
why are you wasting those prescious seconds on W7?

[dinos22]

i think when you start getting low 13m times you are on the right path basically so there is a lot more tweaking required to get there

[rickss69]

Originally Posted by dinos22

rick why dont you test with XP man
why are you wasting those prescious seconds on W7?

No matter now lol. My phase unit just broke in half. I will have to test it another time. Now where did I put sdumper's phone number....:sign14: