[Kal-EL]

Originally Posted by 3oh6

nope, and the 4890x4 runs great on the Classified, no need for that ASUS stuff

So we shouldnt expect any improvements from the dual nf200 chips then?

[3oh6]

Originally Posted by Kal-EL

So we shouldnt expect any improvements from the dual nf200 chips then?

not sure what you mean or why you would draw that conclusion from my answer.

[Kal-EL]

Originally Posted by 3oh6

not sure what you mean or why you would draw that conclusion from my answer.

You said the classy runs 4x4890 fine, no need for that asus stuff. I thought that Asus board had 2 nf200 chips vs the Classy without. So I deduced that the difference between the boards being the nf200 chips was the mitigating factor in your statement "we don't need that Asus stuff".

Its apparent by your last response that I was wrong and it has more to do with the simple fact that the Classified runs the 4x4890's fine.

Gotta remember, Supes is a noob4life forgive the noob who's still sportin s775

[3oh6]

Originally Posted by Kal-EL

You said the classy runs 4x4890 fine, no need for that asus stuff. I thought that Asus board had 2 nf200 chips vs the Classy without. So I deduced that the difference between the boards being the nf200 chips was the mitigating factor in your statement "we don't need that Asus stuff".

Its apparent by your last response that I was wrong and it has more to do with the simple fact that the Classified runs the 4x4890's fine.

haha, no worries. i have also been up for all but 3 days straight so i thought i might have just been missing something.

but yeah, my statement was simply based on the fact that 4x4890's run fine on the Classified, i no idea about the P6T7 WS. but since you mention it, that is a good question.

one school of thought is that 1 NF200 chip hinders performance slightly from what people have tested, so two would further hinder performance.

the other school of thought would be that somehow having two working in unison might help the 4x4890 setup due to so much data being pushed from 4 cards.

my guess is there will be no benefit going from a single NF200 (Classified) to a dual NF200 (P6T7 WS) as i believe they both just end up pushing the data to the IOH through the same BUS. obviously empirical testing is the only way to find out though...who's got a P6T7 WS they want to lend me for a weekend of testing

[Kal-EL]

Originally Posted by 3oh6

haha, no worries. i have also been up for all but 3 days straight so i thought i might have just been missing something.

but yeah, my statement was simply based on the fact that 4x4890's run fine on the Classified, i no idea about the P6T7 WS. but since you mention it, that is a good question.

one school of thought is that 1 NF200 chip hinders performance slightly from what people have tested, so two would further hinder performance.

the other school of thought would be that somehow having two working in unison might help the 4x4890 setup due to so much data being pushed from 4 cards.

my guess is there will be no benefit going from a single NF200 (Classified) to a dual NF200 (P6T7 WS) as i believe they both just end up pushing the data to the IOH through the same BUS. obviously empirical testing is the only way to find out though...who's got a P6T7 WS they want to lend me for a weekend of testing

Excellent noob-friendly answer, thx bro

[thebanik]

hoping EVGA has something unique up its sleeve or maybe its just the GT300's

[westsider]

i think its just a simple classified

[Kal-EL]

Originally Posted by westsider

i think its just a simple classified

sign1 to the forum

[westsider]

thanks m8
but this topic says something secret had to be reveled from EVGA
i can see simple classified

i cannot imagine anything more than classified as X58

[Splave]

Originally Posted by westsider

thanks m8
but this topic says something secret had to be reveled from EVGA
i can see simple classified

i cannot imagine anything more than classified as X58

you do realize they make more than just motherboards right lol
The board is shown, its gpu's that are not