[Mr.Scott]

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.ph...newpost&t=9599
I could really use an objective view or two here.

[Kal-EL]

Fred doesn't seem to be buying into the change, I think it'll be o.k., will post nonetheless.

Moved into Hwbot Section.

[Mr.Scott]

Thanks brother, I appreciate your input regardless of what it might be.
I might be getting worked up over nothing, but frankly, losing 1500 points and 12 positions because of the last "fix" left a bad taste in my mouth.

[Kal-EL]

I don't think we need any "fine" tuning of points, it is what it is, aint broke don't fix. Just bench.....
I hear you on the frustration Scotty, you guys were pummeled in the last revision.

[RomDominance]

Still regret that change too Scotty. The Empire has your back.

[GFDuke]

I agree Scotty. I would post there but there are already enough OCA members posting. I don't wanna seem like we are ganging up .

[Mr.Scott]

Thanks Rick, Rom, and Duke....I totally understand. I thank you guys for the support. It's already overwhelming. I think they'll get the point................I hope.

[Patch]

Chimed in in my own way.

I like the big point spread for 1st, 2nd and 3rd.

Makes winning worth fighting for. The suggested revision would effectively make the rank above you not worth the time and effort.

[Neuromancer]

Thanks brought up my whole issue with i7 again. making people think it is better than it was...

(IE not reporting actually operating frequency vice reported clock. Makes people think i7 is more efficient than it is).

Not that is not a great cpu... but as a sponser of fairness... AMD had to clock that equally and it was reported otherwise...

I do not envy those faye bastards. Not at all.

[rickss69]

Probably should not have but I lol'd at my last post there.